If ever you naively believe in popular uprisings bursting into revolutions “breaking” non “democratic” (a nonsense concept) regimes to ensure a free independent society then you are advised to listen to this report explaining you how revolutions are engineered by criminal gangs wearing the cloak of virtuous and moral “democratic” countries…
How To Engineer A Crisis
Are you a dictator in need of public support for your latest draconian clampdown on dissent? Or a deep state plotter hoping to topple a foreign government who doesn’t comply with your every wish? A low-level Machiavellian schemer looking for the ultimate trick for defeating your enemies without lifting a finger? Then look no further than this handy-dandy guide to “How To Engineer A Crisis.”
Most of the analyses present the confrontation that takes place in the Middle East in terms of a battle of influence between Iran and Saudi Arabia, in other words between Persians and Arabs. The media propaganda with the help of politicians has been trying hard to cover it up at times as a war between Shia and Sunnah Muslims. This could have been true if Saudi Arabia was an independent and sovereign state.
In fact, since The Quincy Agreement, sealed on February 14, 1945, between President Roosevelt and King Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia all experts and historians know that it is the United States that has assumed full responsibility for the security of the Arab-Persian Gulf area not only for oil sake but also for strategic issues dealing with the region’s security as the centre of the US ‘vital interests’. This means that Washington makes this space an almost American colony, something next to Puerto Rico’s status. Let’s say « an implicit agreement. »
The attack on Yemen is not “Saudi-led” but merely Saudi-fronted. Britain and America are concealed behind what Lord Curzon once called an ‘Arab facade’. Philip Hammond claimed Britain aren’t directly involved in the Yemen campaign but hinted they could be in the future. He instead states that Britain will support the assault on Yemen “in every practical way short of engaging in combat”.  Below is a catalogue of British involvement, based on reporting so far:
Direct involvement by British personnel
- British military personnel key in the codes that help select and attack targets. 
- Britain provides Saudi Arabia with intelligence for targeting. 
- “[S]ix [British] experts are working with Saudi targeteers who select locations for attack.” 
- British officials have access to lists of targets. 
- Targeting training: Britain is providing targeting training to Saudi forces, including for cruise missile attacks. Three three-week courses in targeting for the Royal Saudi Air Force (20 attendees on each). Saudi land forces were trained in targeting and “weapons-locating radar”. 
How America backed the ISIS Takeover and Destruction of Palmyra
Lire la suite ISIS, the new american army !
The day before September 11, 2001 was like any normal day in New York City. September 10, 2001 was unaware of the earthshaking events which would happen the next day. Similarly, one might think the day before the violence broke out in Deraa, Syria in March 2011 would have been an uneventful day, unaware of the uprising about to begin.
But, that was not the case. Deraa was teaming with activity and foreign visitors to Syria well before the staged uprising began its opening act. The Omari Mosque was the scene of backstage preparations, costume changes and rehearsals. The Libyan terrorists, fresh from the battlefield of the US-NATO regime change attack on Libya, were in Deraa well ahead of the March 2011 uprising violence. Lire la suite The day before Deraa: How the war broke out in Syria
Fifteen of the 9/11 “hijackers” from Saudi Arabia were CIA agents working for the United States government, which was seeking to destroy the Middle East for Israel and to double the American military budget, says Dr. Kevin Barrett, an American academic who has been studying the events of 9/11 since late 2003.